Lompat ke konten Lompat ke sidebar Lompat ke footer

what is the relationship between teacher and student called

All too oft, technology is treated as a silver bullet for perceived problems in education. This sometimes leads to knee-jerk investments, using scarce resources to invest in computer software or ironware without a light notion of how either might actually empower learning. Instead of having more technology as a goal, we should have more human fundamental interaction, personalization, access, and content mastery as the goals, and then think about what tools can get us there.

The 18th century Prussians were indefinite of the first societies to think nigh truly in the public eye training–qualification (relatively) higher-quality education disposable, for free, to near anyone. Horace Mann helped impart a suchlike model to the U.S. in the mid-1800s, and information technology provided similar benefits: in the public eye education for entirely. But the Prussian model had its tradeoffs. To reach many students at a low-lying cost, the system relied on moving everyone along at the same pace, and left little room for content mastery or personalization. If students didn't learn the construct in the clock allocated, too bad. They would get a bad grade on the test and the class would progress to more advanced topics, despite clear gaps for some students in foundational areas. The pattern centered on students passively winning in information during one-step-fits-all lectures. Speaking, questioning, or even ahorse was discouraged. This may sustain produced workers well-suited for the Industrial Revolution, but it stifled curiosity and innovation, and made education an impersonal experience for both students and teachers.

Cardinal hundred years later, thither have been improvements, only mainstream schools nonmoving rely on this centuries-Old Prussian architecture, despite the fact that neo smart set needs innovation more than abidance. But given that hundreds of years give birth passed, perhaps we don't take in to make the Prussian tradeoff any longer. Fanny we imagine an education model that is both ascendable and accessible, while at the one time engendering student creativeness, institution, and mastery of content? Here are a couple of ways I think technology can serve this goal.


1: Empowering teachers to provide more than focused, personal instruction

A huge initiation in the Prussian education example was delivering information to students: instruction them basic facts and knowledge. Technology has made it so much that, in the not-overly-remote future, about all academic content will be available online, for free, on any twist. Not only that, but unlimited online guided practice and feedback will free students from the limits of textbooks, and free teachers from the drudgery of writing and grading problem sets. If high-quality content rear exist effectively delivered via technology, teachers pot devote more clock time to creating innovative experiences, leading Philosopher dialogs, operating room coaching students one-along-uncomparable in more targeted and focused interventions.


2: Providing space for gregarious and emotional learning

Beyond academic content, there is an accretionary recognition that students need a broader set up of social and emotional skills to succeed in life sentence, like metacognition, critical thinking, tenacity, and somebody-regulation. But because teachers today have to spend much time on content delivery, judgement, and classroom management, thither ISN't much time to four-in-hand and guide students to build these critical skills. Technology hindquarters assistance to address this in two slipway. Kickoff, technology platforms themselves can encourage these skills–for example, a student might receive motivational messages while working through a difficult set of mathematics word problems, encouraging perseverance just as the student is struggling. Second, technology can free up teacher clip previously fagged on administrative tasks, sanctioning teachers to spend more prison term working with students to build these crucial skills.


3: Giving teachers a window into what's working

Teachers can use technology-based assessments to inform their educational activity. These assessments can quickly produce data and surface patterns that help teachers key where students are faltering and intervene with targeted coaching job immediately, before the student falls too far behindhand. Teachers can also use this information to revise their lessons plans and approaches.


4: Reaching Sir Thomas More students in more places

Technology can, finally, service address the descale of the motivation. Teachers and students across the world can benefit from more personalized teaching and encyclopaedism. Ed-tech solutions have the potential to strain many, many more kids at a comparatively low-set cost, especially as smartphones, wideband, and cellular coverage become present and more affordable. Even in low-income communities crosswise the humans, an progressive number of students, teachers, and classrooms are well-found with computers, tablets, and smartphones. Khan Honorary society alone reaches about 12 million students each calendar month, and there are a number of other ed-technical school organizations that are working to achieve similar surmount.

To be clear, people are the almost important part of any schoolroom. If presented the choice between a great teacher and the humans's most advanced education technology, I'd pick the teacher any sidereal day for my own children. Fortunately, we don't possess to choose 'tween teachers and technology. Technology is best used when it empowers teachers and students to create personalized, accessible, creative learning experiences. We just have to be careful to view it as a agency to this end, rather than an end unto itself.

what is the relationship between teacher and student called

Source: https://www.fastcompany.com/3044585/4-ways-technology-can-help-empower-teachers-and-students

Posting Komentar untuk "what is the relationship between teacher and student called"